5일	주간 보너스 이벤트: 전역 퀘스트
6일	신화 쐐기돌 던전 인터내셔널: 어둠땅 2021 1 시즌이 도착했습니다!
11일	주간 보너스 이벤트: 전역 퀘스트
13일	토르가스트: 허망의 동굴의 야수 보너스 이벤트가 시작되었습니다
13일	아레나 월드 챔피언십: 어둠땅 2021 1 시즌이 시작됩니다!

15일	아레나 월드 챔피언십과 신화 쐐기돌 던전 인터내셔널 2021 계획을 공개합니다!
19일	토르가스트의 뒤틀린 회랑에서 괴물들을 처단하세요
1달	주간 애완동물 대전 보너스 이벤트
1달	긴급 수정 사항: 1월 25일 업데이트
1달	개인정보 처리방침 개정 안내 (2021년 1월 1일 시행)

최근 뉴스

모두 보기 »

	1월 28일 PvP 밸런스 조정 사항 - 영혼 소집, 삼위일체의 수호물 너프 등
	어둠땅 1 시즌 내 쐐기 직업 조합과 메타
8시간	수석 콘셉트 아티스트 콜 이스트번 님의 다양한 어둠땅 콘셉트 아트
14시간	X Practice 애드온으로 어둠땅 공격대 공략법 연습하기
1일	디아블로: 이모탈 데이터마이닝 - 야수 적 모델

1일	Fan Demonstrates Character Customization Possibilities
1일	수석 레벨 디자이너 콜린 볼라스 님의 몽환숲, 저편 및 나락
2일	MDI 팀이 선보인 티르너 사이드의 안개 내 정신 지배 트릭
2일	Player Suggests Supplementary Talent Tree for Legacy Content
2일	던전 환경 아티스트 앤서니 트루지요 님의 토르가스트 및 저편 작업물

PST - Episode 20

2011/03/12 시간 19:34에 devolore에 의해 작성됨

댓글을 달려면 로그인하세요 7개의 댓글들

424328의 댓글This post was from a user who has deleted their account.793900의 댓글This post was from a user who has deleted their account.pnkflffytutu의 댓글so firelands is delayed right?714593의 댓글This post was from a user who has deleted their account.ProHib의 댓글I heard Firelands was delayed.Orranis의 댓글Blizzard should implement a feedback system, where people could rate other players after a random dungeon.

Players would then get a bonus or penalty to their position in the random queue (ex., the top 10% players would immediately jump 10 places ahead when they join the queue, while the bottom 10% of players would get "overtaken" by the next 10 players to join, unless those were also in the worst 10%). The game would keep track of each player's 100 or 200 most recent ratings (over a maximum of 3 months or so), and delete older ones, to calculate a relevant "popularity score". Players should not be able to see who voted for them, or their exact rating (maybe just "current standing: excellent / good / poor", depending on their average). There could be achievements for getting a certain number of positive votes (ex., 1 vote, 10 votes, 100 votes, with the last one awarding a title like "Mister / Miss Popularity"). If you played with the same player twice, his latest vote would overwrite the previous one. All this is pretty trivial to implement, since Blizzard already has this kind of interface built into the game (the "GM Survey" you get after talking to a GM, just replace the questions with each player's name and disable the comments field).

Alternatively, to use a system already 100% in place, people on more than 10 ignore lists should get a penalty (ex., minimum 10 minute penalty when joining for a random and no "luck of the draw" buff for them).

GMs don't give a copulation about bad behaviour (the typical reply is "they abused the system to screw you and help some friend of theirs? too bad, that is something you must solve with them", even though they aren't even on your realm and there's absolutely nothing you can do except talk to a GM, whose single function these days seems to consist of cut & paste - and interrupting boss fights, as if they had no way of knowing what you're doing when they page you), and the game is getting progressively more staturated with jerks, so if Blizzard doesn't want to deal with it (because they consider the subscription money from jerks more important than the health of the game), at least implement some kind of semi-automatic system to let players rate each other (with consequences).rixius의 댓글Blizzard should implement a feedback system, where people could rate other players after a random dungeon.

Players would then get a bonus or penalty to their position in the random queue (ex., the top 10% players would immediately jump 10 places ahead when they join the queue, while the bottom 10% of players would get "overtaken" by the next 10 players to join, unless those were also in the worst 10%). The game would keep track of each player's 100 or 200 most recent ratings (over a maximum of 3 months or so), and delete older ones, to calculate a relevant "popularity score". Players should not be able to see who voted for them, or their exact rating (maybe just "current standing: excellent / good / poor", depending on their average). There could be achievements for getting a certain number of positive votes (ex., 1 vote, 10 votes, 100 votes, with the last one awarding a title like "Mister / Miss Popularity"). If you played with the same player twice, his latest vote would overwrite the previous one. All this is pretty trivial to implement, since Blizzard already has this kind of interface built into the game (the "GM Survey" you get after talking to a GM, just replace the questions with each player's name and disable the comments field).

Alternatively, to use a system already 100% in place, people on more than 10 ignore lists should get a penalty (ex., minimum 10 minute penalty when joining for a random and no "luck of the draw" buff for them).

GMs don't give a copulation about bad behaviour (the typical reply is "they abused the system to screw you and help some friend of theirs? too bad, that is something you must solve with them", even though they aren't even on your realm and there's absolutely nothing you can do except talk to a GM, whose single function these days seems to consist of cut & paste - and interrupting boss fights, as if they had no way of knowing what you're doing when they page you), and the game is getting progressively more staturated with jerks, so if Blizzard doesn't want to deal with it (because they consider the subscription money from jerks more important than the health of the game), at least implement some kind of semi-automatic system to let players rate each other (with consequences).

« 다음 게시물

이전 게시물 »

PST - Episode 20

관련있는 글들

댓글

댓글 달기