New Warcraft Movie Images, Legion Enchants, Bringer of the Light Questline, Mad Merchant Followup

2016/05/11 시간 11:00에 perculia에 의해 작성됨

WarcraftWarcraft Movie HubWarcraft Movie Press Photospress screening last nightBringer of the Light QuestlineLegion Enchants발톱의 징표

치명타 및 극대화의 구속: The Loyal Druid summoned by your neck enchantment gains a bleed attack.

가속의 구속: The Loyal Druid summoned by your neck enchantment learns a healing spell.

특화의 구속: The Loyal Druid summoned by your neck enchantment learns a spell to root enemies in place.

유연성의 구속: The Loyal Druid summoned by your neck enchantment amplifies damage that you deal.

힘의 구속: The Loyal Druid summoned by your neck enchantment learns Bear Form.

민첩성의 구속: The Loyal Druid summoned by your neck enchantment learns Cat Form.

지능의 구속: The Loyal Druid summoned by your neck enchantment learns Moonkin Form.

원거리 군사의 징표

치명타 및 극대화의 구속: The attack triggered by your neck enchantment can temporarily blind enemies.

가속의 구속: The attack triggered by your neck enchantment deals damage in a larger radius.

특화의 구속: The attack triggered by your neck enchantment returns some of the damage dealt back to you as health.

유연성의 구속: The attack triggered by your neck enchantment amplifies damage that you deal.

힘의 구속: The rain of arrows triggered by your neck enchantment becomes a flurry of glaives.

민첩성의 구속: The rain of arrows triggered by your neck enchantment becomes a rain of fiery arrows.

지능의 구속: The rain of arrows triggered by your neck enchantment becomes a rain of holy bolts.

숨은 사티로스의 징표

치명타 및 극대화의 구속: The Trickster summoned by your neck enchantment will absorb some of the damage you take.

가속의 구속: The Trickster summoned by your neck enchantment can temporarily stun enemies.

특화의 구속: The Trickster summoned by your neck enchantment gains a damaging curse attack.

유연성의 구속: The Trickster summoned by your neck enchantment amplifies damage that you deal.

힘의 구속: The Trickster summoned by your neck enchantment imbues his attacks with fire.

민첩성의 구속: The Trickster summoned by your neck enchantment imbues his attacks with fel energy.

지능의 구속: The Trickster summoned by your neck enchantment imbues his attacks with shadow.

shoulder enchantsglove enchantsPets and ToysRelicsThe Mad Merchantseries of lengthy posts광기 어린 상인붉은송곳니 고치붉은송곳니 고치

Watcher

Just a simple question that they won't answer: Will the mount be unique or will it show up reskinned elsewhere? If it's unique, I'll buy it. If it's not, I won't.

What conceivable reason could they have to not answer something so simple? So frustrating.

붉은송곳니 고치말쥐

댓글을 달려면 로그인하세요 46개의 댓글들

12 3

다음 › 마지막 »

968833의 댓글This post was from a user who has deleted their account.Purgatorywolf의 댓글I'm still sad that the only dragon to be in Draenor the FaeDragon, was only available via the store. :(lonesamurai1의 댓글Nerubians as playable races in a spider expansion?

Yes Please!ahunter8056의 댓글Those stills all look amazing! Can't wait for this film. Don't know what all these people claiming "bad CGI" are taking about, the CGI looks amazing. Clearly they just want something to complain about, because I see absolutely nothing wrong with it. I'm not trying to say everyone should agree with me, but if there truly was something wrong with it, I wouldn't hesitate to be brutally honest. It's puzzling how so many Warcraft fans clearly just want this film to fail so badly that they'll invent problems it doesn't have, simply because of the track record films based on games have.

Very interested in the context of the still showing the Horde standing behind Lothar in a seemingly supportive fashion. Will be very intriguing as to what is happening during that scene. Perhaps they're Durotan sympathisers, and a small splinter group is formed? Who knows? But I can't wait to find out.darkelemental1의 댓글This whole 2 million gold mount thing is idiotic, the response has been terrible, splits the playerbase even more, and the defense by watcher was basically a middle finger to anyone who disagreed after trying to justify it by connecting it to mounts with actual value. They just should have never made it in the first place, put a new vendor mount there and I would expect not even half as many people would have complained. Its almost like Blizzard enjoys stirring the pot , pissing people off, and distracting the base from their bad class decisions. They should run for Congress.AuszarTheVile의 댓글Honestly, I don't really care how high the price is for that mount, as myself I am an arachnophobe, it's just a mount. I can see why people are upset by the massive price tag on it, that is if you're a mount hoarder and like collecting mounts from every expac. It doesn't really make a difference to me, but it's the same deal with the Grand Yak and other expensive mounts, if you really want it, just farm the gold. If this mount will be an expense equivalent to how the other mounts were in their expansions, then I imagine that gold will be easier to get and the same difficulty as it was before.Alterrax의 댓글Some people are just upset that they can't afford it. It's a mount FFS, big deal if not everyone can get it.Yoco의 댓글The 2m gold spider is pure bull%^&*. It's just a spider (cool model, yes, but that's all) and it is 10x the expedition yak's mount. They should add some features (i.e. making possible to crawl on walls) to make worth the cost or the spider might be bought only by the ones who capped the gold already in WoD. As for me, I wouldn't save that much gold on a spider neither the 100k for the toy. I don't find them as worth the effort as the yak or even cheaper mounts like the Vial of the Sands.

Those stills all look amazing! Can't wait for this film. Don't know what all these people claiming "bad CGI" are taking about, the CGI looks amazing. Clearly they just want something to complain about, because I see absolutely nothing wrong with it. I'm not trying to say everyone should agree with me, but if there truly was something wrong with it, I wouldn't hesitate to be brutally honest. It's puzzling how so many Warcraft fans clearly just want this film to fail so badly that they'll invent problems it doesn't have, simply because of the track record films based on games have.AM1176의 댓글QQ the mount is too expensive... Solution? Don't buy it. Problem solved!veselo의 댓글They try to reduce amount of gold circling in the world this way. Less golds less gametime tokens, more real money subs.UsuallySpooky의 댓글"But in the distant future? Who knows. Maybe some day we make a spider expansion, all about spiders, complete with a playable arachnid race (this is where I alienate all the arachnophobes who were grateful for my first post in this thread), and there are spider mounts everywhere. So I can't say "never." "

Please do.
I'd love a spider expansion.Crawclaw의 댓글QQ the mount is too expensive... Solution? Don't buy it. Problem solved!Abbaddon19Twink의 댓글O m g,I can't wait to see Suramar!liotie의 댓글I feel like they are overthinking the way they hand out rewards.Monkeyking908의 댓글They try to reduce amount of gold circling in the world this way. Less golds less gametime tokens, more real money subs.JolietJerry의 댓글This whole 2 million gold mount thing is idiotic, the response has been terrible, splits the playerbase even more, and the defense by watcher was basically a middle finger to anyone who disagreed after trying to justify it by connecting it to mounts with actual value. They just should have never made it in the first place, put a new vendor mount there and I would expect not even half as many people would have complained. Its almost like Blizzard enjoys stirring the pot , pissing people off, and distracting the base from their bad class decisions. They should run for Congress.Withers의 댓글Maybe it's just me but the whole, "2 million gold is outrageous rabble rabble rabble!" thing just screams entitlement to me. On the other hand, I don't see people screaming about not having access to the mythic raid mounts. Hmm.. /shrug either way I hope people can somehow carry on with their lives and we can move past this completely unnecessary conversation.artenesse의 댓글Ugh, people complaining about bad CGI from an oscar winning special effects guy. Basically STOP TALKING you idiot.sparkytiz의 댓글the reason why the cgi looks so bad is because the film isn't running at 70-90 frames per second to blend it IE lotr, and films akin to this nature. This movie is still in the same vein of lotr and other high fantasy films, they opted out of the video game look which is what the higher frame rates would have achieved. Now this is just a opinion but just because your a fan doesn't mean that when you say something is bad doesn't mean you want something to fail. Also for people claiming the cgi is from one guy it is actually from a team which has its own special division's inside it. The cgi is actually handled by Industrial Light & Magic. Which have some pretty decent cgi in movies like "The Revenat" and "The Martian" now the blame isn't necessarily on the head of the team behind the cgi. It is kinda a mix of all the departments like cinematography and art department. In short the movie may do well it may not so people think it looks good and other don't it is a matter of opinion. It doesn't make someone a idiot for not agreeing with what u believe but hard evidence is you take the look of the cgi and the fact there is almost zero practicals, and it kinda makes everything looking like "For the King".AeronPeryton의 댓글Maybe some day we make a spider expansion, all about spiders, complete with a playable arachnid race

12 3

다음 › 마지막 »

« 다음 게시물

이전 게시물 »

New Warcraft Movie Images, Legion Enchants, Bringer of the Light Questline, Mad Merchant Followup

관련있는 글들

댓글

댓글 달기